Headscale vs Innernet
Self-host pick — both replace Tailscale (Mesh VPN / zero-config networking).
Both Headscale and Innernet self-host as a replacement for Tailscale (Mesh VPN / zero-config networking). Pick Headscale if you want the lighter footprint — 20min (single Go binary + reverse proxy), $5 vps — coordination only, traffic is peer-to-peer. Pick Innernet if you need static, server-to-server meshes (small fleet, infra-only) — 20min (single Rust binary per host) and $5 vps for the coordination server.
| Headscaleopen-source | Innernetopen-source | |
|---|---|---|
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Setup time | 20min (single Go binary + reverse proxy) | 20min (single Rust binary per host) |
| Monthly cost | $5 VPS — coordination only, traffic is peer-to-peer. | $5 VPS for the coordination server. |
| GitHub | juanfont/headscale | tonarino/innernet |
| Replaces | Tailscale | Tailscale |
Good fit for
In a terminal? npx -y github:SolvoHQ/os-alt-cli tailscale prints Tailscale's self-host options including both —
how the CLI works →
FAQ
Which is easier to self-host, Headscale or Innernet?
Headscale: 20min (single Go binary + reverse proxy). Innernet: 20min (single Rust binary per host).
What does each cost to run?
Headscale: $5 VPS — coordination only, traffic is peer-to-peer.. Innernet: $5 VPS for the coordination server.. Both projects are free and open source.
Do Headscale and Innernet replace the same SaaS?
Yes — both are open-source alternatives to Tailscale.