SeaweedFS vs AWS S3
Self-host swap-in for AWS S3. · Self-host AWS S3 · SeaweedFS on os-alt
SeaweedFS is one of the open-source self-host replacements for AWS S3 — license Apache-2.0, 15min docker-compose (master + volume + filer) to stand up, and $5-10 vps for small deployments; designed to scale to billions of small files cheaply. Compare against AWS S3's $0.023/GB/mo + egress; egress dominates the bill once you serve traffic from S3 below.
| SeaweedFSopen-source | AWS S3paid SaaS | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Object storage / blob store | Object storage / blob store |
| License / pricing | Apache-2.0 | $0.023/GB/mo + egress; egress dominates the bill once you serve traffic from S3 |
| Starting price | $0 self-host | $5/user/mo |
| GitHub | seaweedfs/seaweedfs | closed source |
| Setup time | 15min docker-compose (master + volume + filer) | SaaS — sign up + bill |
| Monthly cost | $5-10 VPS for small deployments; designed to scale to billions of small files cheaply. | from $5/user/mo ($0.023/GB/mo + egress; egress dominates the bill once you serve traffic from S3) |
Switching from AWS S3 to SeaweedFS
Run a SeaweedFS S3 gateway (`weed s3`); it exposes an S3-compatible endpoint. Copy from S3 with `aws s3 sync s3://your-bucket s3://your-bucket --endpoint-url https://seaweed.example.com:8333` after configuring the destination credentials. App code points its SDK at the gateway URL.
- Good fit for
- Workloads with billions of small files (thumbnails, IoT events) where MinIO's per-object overhead bites.
- Weak at
- Operational surface is larger (master / volume / filer / S3 components); weaker GUI than MinIO.
Other open-source self-host alternatives to AWS S3
In a terminal? npx os-alt aws-s3 prints AWS S3's self-host options —
how the CLI works →
FAQ
Is SeaweedFS a free alternative to AWS S3?
Yes — SeaweedFS is open source under Apache-2.0. Self-host cost: $5-10 VPS for small deployments; designed to scale to billions of small files cheaply.. AWS S3 starts at $5/user/mo ($0.023/GB/mo + egress; egress dominates the bill once you serve traffic from S3).
How long does SeaweedFS take to set up vs AWS S3?
Self-hosting SeaweedFS: 15min docker-compose (master + volume + filer). AWS S3 is a hosted SaaS — sign up and you're in.
What is SeaweedFS good at, and what is it weak at?
Good fit for: Workloads with billions of small files (thumbnails, IoT events) where MinIO's per-object overhead bites.. Weak at: Operational surface is larger (master / volume / filer / S3 components); weaker GUI than MinIO..